A few months ago I was watching my daughter sleep. She was maybe three months old at the time and I was exhausted in a way I didn’t know was possible. My wife finally rested, the apartment was quiet, and I had a strange, disorienting thought: I could just talk to an AI right now.
Not because I needed the information. Not because I needed to solve a problem. But because I was single, that’s how lonely new parents are when you’re surrounded by people who need you all the time, and yet you feel completely unnoticed.
I did not open the program. Instead, I texted my brother something nonsensical about football. He responded with the same nonsensical comment, and somehow that was enough.
The loneliness is gone a little.
That moment stuck with me because it raised a question I’ve wondered about ever since: What actually helps a person feel less alone? And can AI provide it?
Loneliness we’re really talking about
First, we need to define exactly what loneliness is. It’s not the same as being single. I spend hours alone writing early in the morning before my family wakes up and those are some of my best moments. Loneliness, as researchers define it, is the gap between the connection you want and the connection you think you have.
This disconnect explains why you can feel desperately lonely at a crowded party and perfectly content on a solo stroll through Saigon. This is subjective. It’s about perception, not census data.
Psychologist John Cachopawho has studied loneliness for decades, compared it to hunger or thirst: a biological signal that tells you that something essential is missing. If this signal is triggered for a short time, it is working. It prompts you to reconnect. But when it becomes chronic (which happens in 15 to 30 percent of people), it stops being helpful and starts disrupting things: cognition, sleep, immune function, even gene expression.
So the question is not whether loneliness is serious. That’s right. The question is what it actually solves.
Four things that make us feel less alone
As you delve deeper into the study of connection and loneliness, a few key elements keep emerging. Think of these as the active ingredients of human interaction:
1. To be heard. Not only that someone is listening, but also the feeling that they really understood what you said. Research from the University of Groningen has shown that feeling a sense of belonging depends on attention, empathy and respect, as well as feeling a common language with the other person.
2. To be seen. It goes beyond hearing. It’s about someone perceiving you accurately, including the parts you don’t say out loud. When my wife notices that I’m stressed before I say anything, they can see it.
3. Reciprocity. True connection is not a monologue. This involves a back and forth where both people are exchanged. You share something vulnerable, the other person responds with something genuine, and suddenly you’re both in new territory together.
4. Embodied presence. There is something about being physically with another person (or even just existing in real time) that affects us differently than asynchronous communication. Our nervous system has evolved to co-regulate with other nervous systems. When someone is actually there, our body knows it.
These four things explain why a short, almost meaningless message from my brother at 3am helped more than a perfectly formed chatbot reply. He was real, he was around, and we had decades of shared context.
What artificial intelligence research actually shows
This is where things get complicated. Research into AI tools for mental health is both promising and sobering.
The 2025 study in Journal of Medical Internet Research found that social chatbots can help reduce feelings of loneliness and social anxiety, especially when they are approachable and provide empathetic responses. Users appreciate having something available 24/7 that doesn’t judge them.
But a four-week study by MIT and OpenAI found something troubling: While some chatbot features (such as voice interaction) modestly reduced loneliness, heavy daily use was linked to greater loneliness, emotional dependence on AI, and reduced real-world communication. The pattern shows that light use can supplement human connection, and heavy use can replace it.
A systematic review covering 160 studies from 2020 to 2024, found that only 16 percent of AI chatbot studies had undergone rigorous clinical trials. Most are still in early screening. We’re rolling out these tools at scale while we’re still figuring out if they work.
The honest answer: we don’t know for sure. But early patterns show that artificial intelligence can provide temporary relief without addressing the underlying need for real human connection.
Why doesn’t artificial intelligence feel heard?
An AI chatbot can say, “I understand how difficult this is for you.” This can elicit responses that sound sympathetic. But here’s the inconvenient truth: He doesn’t really understand. He has no experience to draw from. It doesn’t matter what you said to him in future interactions.
Neuroscience studies have shown this feeling clear activates reward centers in the brain (ventral striatum) and areas associated with social connection. The feeling of ambiguity activates regions associated with negative affect. Our brains care a lot about whether we are truly understood, not just whether someone will say the right words.
When I practice Vietnamese with my wife and she patiently corrects my tone, the connection is more than just the conversation. The fact is that she decided to spend time helping me, knowing how important it was to my relationship with her family. AI can adjust my tones more effectively. But it could not be of such importance.
Counterargument: AI can still help
I don’t mean to be too dismissive. There are situations where AI mental health tools can really help:
Availability. Not everyone has access to a therapist or trusted friend to call at 2am. For people in isolated situations, something is better than nothing.
Practical platform. Some research suggests that AI chatbots can help people practice social skills or process emotions before interacting with humans. It’s like stretching before a workout.
Consistency. AI doesn’t have bad days. It is not tired of your problems. For people whose human relationships were unreliable, such predictability could be healing.
Entry with low rates. It’s easier to confess your loneliness to a chatbot than to a friend. If AI helps someone recognize that they need communication, that’s valuable, even if AI isn’t the ultimate solution.
The danger is not that AI is completely useless for solitude. It can be useful enough to prevent people from looking for what they really need.
What people do wrong when solving loneliness
Here’s a pattern I’ve noticed both in research and in my own life: We tend to assume that loneliness depends on the amount of contact. More friends, more messages, more communication. But research shows that it’s about quality and fit.
One study found what was actually associated with being with others while feeling alone worse prosperity than loneliness. Researchers have called this the “amplification effect”: when you’re lonely and forced into social situations that don’t meet your needs, loneliness feels more acute, not less.
This may explain why scrolling through social media often makes people feel more alone. You’re technically “connected” to hundreds of people, but the connections are tenuous. You see the highlights rather than sharing the vulnerabilities.
The solution to loneliness isn’t just about “connecting more.” It’s the right kind of connection: deep, mutual, and real enough to bridge the gap between what you want and what you have.
A Buddhist perspective on why this matters
When I was in my early twenties, working as a warehouse worker in Melbourne and feeling deeply confused, I started reading about Buddhism on my phone during my breaks. One idea that stuck with me was the concept of interdependence: recognizing that we only exist in relation to everything else.
Western self-help often emphasizes independence. Stand on your feet. No one needs it. But Buddhist philosophy suggests the opposite: we are fundamentally interconnected, and pretending otherwise is a source of suffering.
From this perspective, loneliness is not just a feeling. This is a wrong perception of reality. We feel alone because we’ve forgotten (or never learned) that we’re always embedded in relationships, even when we can’t see them.
That doesn’t mean artificial intelligence can’t play a role. But it suggests that the deepest cure for loneliness is not finding a substitute for human connection. It is a recollection of who we already are: beings who exist through each other.
2 minute practice
The next time you feel that familiar feeling of loneliness, try this instead of reaching for a screen:
Pause. Notice where loneliness resides in your body. Is it in the chest? Your stomach? Don’t try to fix it yet.
Ask yourself: What kind of connection do I really want right now? Is it to feel heard? Feel seen? To feel that I am important to someone?
Then reach out to one specific person with something real. Not “Hey, what’s up?” but something that reflects what you actually feel. “I was thinking about you.” “I’m having a rough day and I wanted to hear your voice.” “Remember that conversation we had (specific thing)? It stuck with me.”
That’s all. One real message to one real person. Pay attention to what happens in your body afterwards, even if they don’t react immediately.
Common pitfalls
- Mistaking volume for depth. Sending twenty quick text messages to different people is not the same as one vulnerable conversation.
- Using artificial intelligence as a permanent replacement. There’s nothing wrong with talking to a chatbot every once in a while, but if it’s replacing all your attempts at human connection, that’s a red flag.
- Assuming you’re unequivocally rude. Loneliness tells you stories about yourself. These stories are not true. These are symptoms, not facts.
- Waiting until you’re “feeling better” to connect. The connection itself often makes you feel better. You don’t have to be in a good mood to reach out.
- Comparing your interior to others’ exteriors. Social media shows that you are in charge of life. Your loneliness compares your raw experiences with their edited version.
Simple takeout
- Loneliness is the gap between the connection you want and the connection you feel. Bridging this gap requires real human contact, not just any.
- AI tools may offer temporary relief and may be useful as supplements, but they do not provide what humans fundamentally need: to be heard, seen, and truly known by another person.
- The intensive use of artificial intelligence satellites is associated with increased loneliness and decreased communication in the real world. Light, intentional use may vary.
- The quality of communication is more important than the quantity. One deep conversation will outweigh a hundred superficial ones.
- Feeling lonely in the midst of people is real and common. The solution is not communication; it’s more authentic communication.
- If you’re feeling lonely, reach out to one specific person with something true. The practice of authentic connection is healing in itself.
- We are interdependent by nature. Loneliness often comes from forgetting this, not from any personal flaw.
Did you like my article? Like me on Facebook to see more articles like this on your feed.





